2009: ALERTAR – ESCLARECER - DOCUMENTAR – DENUNCIAR - RESISTIR
FLASHES Culturales reitera CSC. 748/09 – por el VIERNES 4 - hora 12.
Se recuerda a todos nuestros suscriptores, corresponsales y amigos:
ESTE VIERNES 4, A PARTIR DE LA HORA 12,
NOS CONCENTRAMOS y MARCHAMOS
DESDE PLAZA INDEPENDENCIA HASTA PLAZA LIBERTAD.
INTERPRETANDO EL SENTIR DEL URUGUAY DEMOCRÁTICO,
EL MISMO QUE LLEVÓ AL GOLPISTA HUGO CHÁVEZ A CANCELAR SU VIAJE A URUGUAY,
ADHERIMOS A LA GRAN MARCHA MUNDIAL CONTRA ESE DÉSPOTA Y SANGUINARIO.
Tengamos siempre presente que el marxismo constituye una ideología perversa,
antinatural e injusta, que genera sistemas totalitarios, liberticidas y
criminales.
El populismo demagógico fractura la sociedad, fomenta el odio y la lucha de
clases, pisotea el derecho de propiedad y la libre iniciativa de los
particulares, destruye el sector privado de la economía expropiando y
confiscando a su antojo, impone tributos confiscatorios y aumenta el
intervencionismo estatal asfixiante y liberticida.
En suma: intervencionismo estatal y planificación centralizada extinguen la
LIBERTAD en todos los ámbitos, por tratarse de un valor indivisible.
Compatriotas:
Repudiemos la CUBANIZACIÓN DE VENEZUELA
y el uso que CHÁVEZ hace de Venezuela como plataforma para
FOMENTAR LA SUBVERSIÓN, LA GUERRILLA Y EL TERRORISMO
en todo el Continente.
Estamos espiritualmente unidos
a la heroica población venezolana que resiste el perverso “Socialismo del
Siglo XXI”.a los hermanos colombianos que sufren las atrocidades del terrorismo de las
FARC, a los valientes hondureños que supieron sacarse de encima a otro de los
peones del castrochavismo y a cientos de miles de personas del mundo libre.
Protestamos contra Chávez y contra todo lo que él representa y simboliza.
Reprobamos su RÉGIMEN CONFISCATORIO Y LIBERTICIDA.
Repudiamos la injerencia del castrochavismo en nuestro país y en todo en
continente, cualquiera sea la forma utilizada.
El tirano Chávez financia a la izquierda en cada país (maletas, empresas
fantasmas, embajadas generosas, fachada de ayuda educativa, deportiva,
sanitaria, etc.)
NO SE LO DEBEMOS PERMITIR.
BASTANTE están sufriendo los venezolanos, colombianos, hondureños, como para
sumar más y más sufrimientos de toda América.
S POLÍTICOS Y TECNÓCRATAS, DIGÁMOSLE BASTA DE COMPLICIDAD:
CON EL CASTROCHAVISMO,CON LA NARCO-GUERRILLA MARXISTA ASESINA DE LAS FARC, CON EL TERRORISMO IRANÍ
CON LOS CRIMINALES ROJOS DE TODAS PARTES,
FLASHES Culturales convoca a expresar públicamente el más enérgico repudio
al castrochavismo y a demostrar nuestra solidaridad con la heroica sociedad
venezolana que resiste el oprobioso “Socialismo del Siglo XXI”.
Hora 12 - CONCENTRACIÓN: PLAZA INDEPENDENCIA – lectura de Proclama y MARCHA
hacia la PLAZA LIBERTAD.
“La balsa sobre ruedas” y la camioneta con altoparlantes encabezarán la
marcha.
Importante: no cortar el tráfico (circular por aceras, caminando siempre
detrás de los carteles y banderas)
No responder provocaciones (como siempre, fotografiar a provocadores y
grabar agresiones verbales).
Coordinaciones: previo a la marcha teléfonos 481 06 94 o 480 21 91
A partir de hora 11 únicamente a través del celular
Sabemos sobradamente que los políticos, los medios masivos de comunicación,
las autodenominadas organizaciones de defensa de DDHH, son insensibles ante
las víctimas del marxismo en Cuba, en Venezuela, en Colombia, en Honduras,
etc. Recordemos nosotros a nuestros compatriotas asesinados por la saña criminal
de la guerrilla tupamara, que operó con el apoyo de la dictadura cubana, y
manifestemos:
Por los cubanos y venezolanos que murieron, víctimas de los aparatos
represivos estatales,
Por los civiles y militares que sufren privación de libertad en las cárceles
de Chávez y Castro,
Por los millones de venezolanos y cubanos que heroicamente arriesgan sus
vidas, cada día, al oponerse a las embestidas sanguinarias de estos
regímenes inescrupulosos,
Por las familias venezolanas y cubanas que fueron y siguen siendo víctimas
de confiscaciones y persecuciones,
Por todos los venezolanos y cubanos que desde dentro y fuera de sus
respectivas Patrias, confían verlas pronto liberadas de esta horrorosa
pesadilla castro-chavista,
Por la plena y efectiva vigencia de derechos y libertades individuales, que
son anteriores y superiores al estado, en toda América
Confiemos que pronto podamos ver la caída de los regímenes ilegítimos de los
hermanos Castro, de Chávez y sus demás compinches.
Basta de tiranías marxistas, cualquiera sea el disfraz que utilicen.
A los Coordinadores:
No perder de vista ni por un instante que nuestros actos públicos tienen
valor simbólico y deben ser ordenados y pacíficos.
Por razones de seguridad, se recomienda muy especialmente cumplir
puntualmente con la hora propuesta de encuentros previos y agruparse en los
lugares acordados.
Si por algún motivo se sugiriese rápida dispersión, es fundamental no
demorar en regresar a los mismos lugares de encuentro combinados.
Reiteramos que es muy importante NO responder a provocaciones.
El respeto al marco ético y jurídico vigente también sirve para marcar
nuestras diferencias con las patotas izquierdistas, idólatras de la tiranía
castrista y del autoritarismo chavista que aquí -y en todas partes- cometen
impunemente todo tipo de atropellos.
De la normalidad de esta actividad pública, dependerá la continuidad de la
realización de las otras iniciativas programadas. Firmeza, coraje y
prudencia.
Servicio de Difusión Selectiva de FLASHESCulturales
Noticias, documentos y opiniones
referentes a cuestiones educativas y culturales.
MEC 114-84-8231 *Reg. Ley Imp. T. VII, Fo. 296
Domicilio: Anzani 2008 – CP 11600 – Montevideo, Uruguay
Tel/faxes: (598-2) 481 06 94 y 480 21 91 -
Esperamos sus comentarios, consultas o sugerencias.
E mail: FlashesCulturales@adinet.com.uy
2009: ALERTAR – ESCLARECER - DOCUMENTAR – DENUNCIAR - RESISTIR
Quienes deseen recibir regularmente FLASHESCulturales,
deben enviar un mensaje cuyo asunto diga SUBSCRIBIR
flashes.subscribir@gmail.com
NO SPAM - si en algún momento, por duplicación errónea o por cualquier otro
motivo, prefiere que cancelemos todo envío nuestro a su dirección, lo
haremos inmediatamente. En tal caso, basta con enviarnos un mensaje cuyo
asunto diga BORRAR y tenga como remitente la misma dirección a la cual le
hemos enviado y que desea remover.
Aprovechamos esta ocasión para agradecer la atención que dedica a nuestros
envíos, disculparnos si es que le ocasionamos alguna molestia y saludarle
muy cordialmente
Prof. Alexander TORRES MEGA
Dir. Resp. de FLASHESCulturales
E mail: FlashesCulturales@adinet.com.uy
Check out YouTube - JAMA Y LIBERTAD Los Fonomemecos Small
YouTube - JAMA Y LIBERTAD Los Fonomemecos Small
Creo que es lo mejor que he leido respecto a lo que hoy sucede. Felicito a
Zoe Valdes por su talento y su patriotica forma de pensar. Gracias Zoe. Tu
das esperanzas! Este mensaje debe ser pasado al mundo entero!
22 December, 2009
It's not just the enemy killing U.S. soldiers
It's not just the enemy killing U.S. soldiers
You won't believe new rules of engagement in Afghanistan
How would you like to fight an ennemy with your both hands tied behind on your back ? http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=118941
FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
It's not just the enemy killing U.S. soldiers You won't believe new rules of engagement in Afghanistan scroll down...! Posted: December 13, 2009 7:26 pm Eastern F. Michael Maloof © 2009 WorldNetDaily Editor's note: The following story is adapted from a report in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Subscriptions to G2 Bulletin are available for $99 a year or for $9.95 per month for credit cards users. WASHINGTON – New military rules of engagement ostensibly to protect Afghan civilians are putting the lives of U.S. forces in jeopardy, claim Army and Marine sources, as the Taliban learns the game plan based the rules' imposed limits. The rules of engagement, or ROEs, apply to all coalition forces of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Their enactment is in response to Afghan President Hamid Karzai's complaints over mounting civilian deaths apparently occurring in firefights. Get the complete report on the new rules of engagement with a subscription to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Despite the fact that the newly arrived U.S. commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, imposed the more restrictive ROEs to minimize the killing of innocent civilians, however, the Taliban is well aware of them and has its own forces acting in ways to counteract them. The impact of new restrictions has created increasing frustration and concern among U.S. Army and Marine Corps troops who now are compelled to follow these rules despite the danger of letting the Taliban live to fight again another day. Critics see the new ROEs being more oriented toward defensive rather than offensive operations, as evidenced by recent charges of murder against two U.S. Army snipers because they had targeted a Taliban commander who reportedly wasn't holding a weapon. The actual ROEs are said to be classified U.S. and NATO secrets, but based on individual soldier accounts, those restrictions include the following: a.. No night or surprise searches b.. Villagers are to be warned prior to searches c.. Afghan National Army, or ANA, or Afghan National Police, or ANP, must accompany U.S. units on searches d.. U.S. soldiers may not fire at insurgents unless they are preparing to fire first e.. U.S. forces cannot engage insurgents if civilians are present f.. Only women can search women g.. Troops can fire on insurgents if they catch them placing an IED but not if insurgents walk away from where the explosives are. Often, rules of engagement require varying levels of approvals before action can be taken. In one case, villagers had tipped off U.S. forces of the presence of a Taliban commander who was threatening village elders. To get permission to go after him, U.S. troops had to get 11 separate Afghan, U.S. and international forces' approval to the plan. The approval, however, did not come until well into the next day. By then, the Taliban commander had moved on, to the consternation of the villagers who had provided the tip. Observers have claimed that it can take some 96 hours to acquire all the permissions to act. Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND. In other cases, the use of force against insurgents may be blocked if they lower their guns, only to have those insurgents return later to attack. Also, ISAF troops cannot engage insurgents if they are leaving an area where an IED has been planted. In one case, insurgents planting an IED had detected the presence of U.S. forces and immediately began leaving the area, tossing evidence of their preparations along the way. U.S. forces could not fire on them. The ROEs in some cases have gone beyond limiting ISAF troops in their operations. In one case, ROE restrictions were in effect when four U.S. Marines twice pleaded by radio for artillery support in combat action in Kunar Province in Afghanistan – and twice they were refused, before they were killed. F. Michael Maloof, a frequent G2B contributor, is a former senior security policy analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He can be contacted here. To get access to the full report, subscribe to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A government that does not trust it's law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust." -- James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President Source: Federalist Papers
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/
James.Madison.Quote.B15E "The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." -- State vs. Kerner Source: 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/State.vs..Kerner.Quote.CA0B
"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm ... is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." -- Wilson v. State Source: 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34Am. Rep
You won't believe new rules of engagement in Afghanistan
How would you like to fight an ennemy with your both hands tied behind on your back ? http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=118941
FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN
It's not just the enemy killing U.S. soldiers You won't believe new rules of engagement in Afghanistan scroll down...! Posted: December 13, 2009 7:26 pm Eastern F. Michael Maloof © 2009 WorldNetDaily Editor's note: The following story is adapted from a report in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Subscriptions to G2 Bulletin are available for $99 a year or for $9.95 per month for credit cards users. WASHINGTON – New military rules of engagement ostensibly to protect Afghan civilians are putting the lives of U.S. forces in jeopardy, claim Army and Marine sources, as the Taliban learns the game plan based the rules' imposed limits. The rules of engagement, or ROEs, apply to all coalition forces of the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Their enactment is in response to Afghan President Hamid Karzai's complaints over mounting civilian deaths apparently occurring in firefights. Get the complete report on the new rules of engagement with a subscription to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin. Despite the fact that the newly arrived U.S. commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, imposed the more restrictive ROEs to minimize the killing of innocent civilians, however, the Taliban is well aware of them and has its own forces acting in ways to counteract them. The impact of new restrictions has created increasing frustration and concern among U.S. Army and Marine Corps troops who now are compelled to follow these rules despite the danger of letting the Taliban live to fight again another day. Critics see the new ROEs being more oriented toward defensive rather than offensive operations, as evidenced by recent charges of murder against two U.S. Army snipers because they had targeted a Taliban commander who reportedly wasn't holding a weapon. The actual ROEs are said to be classified U.S. and NATO secrets, but based on individual soldier accounts, those restrictions include the following: a.. No night or surprise searches b.. Villagers are to be warned prior to searches c.. Afghan National Army, or ANA, or Afghan National Police, or ANP, must accompany U.S. units on searches d.. U.S. soldiers may not fire at insurgents unless they are preparing to fire first e.. U.S. forces cannot engage insurgents if civilians are present f.. Only women can search women g.. Troops can fire on insurgents if they catch them placing an IED but not if insurgents walk away from where the explosives are. Often, rules of engagement require varying levels of approvals before action can be taken. In one case, villagers had tipped off U.S. forces of the presence of a Taliban commander who was threatening village elders. To get permission to go after him, U.S. troops had to get 11 separate Afghan, U.S. and international forces' approval to the plan. The approval, however, did not come until well into the next day. By then, the Taliban commander had moved on, to the consternation of the villagers who had provided the tip. Observers have claimed that it can take some 96 hours to acquire all the permissions to act. Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND. In other cases, the use of force against insurgents may be blocked if they lower their guns, only to have those insurgents return later to attack. Also, ISAF troops cannot engage insurgents if they are leaving an area where an IED has been planted. In one case, insurgents planting an IED had detected the presence of U.S. forces and immediately began leaving the area, tossing evidence of their preparations along the way. U.S. forces could not fire on them. The ROEs in some cases have gone beyond limiting ISAF troops in their operations. In one case, ROE restrictions were in effect when four U.S. Marines twice pleaded by radio for artillery support in combat action in Kunar Province in Afghanistan – and twice they were refused, before they were killed. F. Michael Maloof, a frequent G2B contributor, is a former senior security policy analyst in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. He can be contacted here. To get access to the full report, subscribe to Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"A government that does not trust it's law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust." -- James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President Source: Federalist Papers
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/
James.Madison.Quote.B15E "The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." -- State vs. Kerner Source: 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/State.vs..Kerner.Quote.CA0B
"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm ... is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." -- Wilson v. State Source: 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34Am. Rep
The Contradictory endorsements for the Noble Prize and the rejection of a heroe of the Human Rights
The Contradictory endorsements for the Noble Prize and the rejection of a heroe of the Human Rights.
Share
Posted Apr 2, 2009 by ■ PEDRO MARTORI in Politics
http://www.digitaljournal.com/blog/2467
Add Image»
The Contradictory endorsements for the Noble Prize and the rejection of a heroe of the Human Rights
I have found it indignant and appalling that the majority of the people in this world turn their backs on the Dalai Lama and the plight of the Tibetan people.
The same as it is happening to the Christians in the Sudan region of Dar fur.
Genocides are happening in the eyes of the world nations, yet little or nothing is done , neither the voices are raising their disapproval of the bloody ones that are the first responsible for all these tragedies and ethnically or religious genocides.
Right now another crime is being perpetrated against the women of Afghanistan , where a new "law" is being adopted to discriminate against the women.the said "Law" is a reminiscence of the mentality prevailing there, where a woman worth LESS than horse or a dog.The said "law" would give the right to the "husbands" to RAPE THEIR " WIVES"
It is more than outraging,,degrading to all humans in the world to not condemn , disapprove and denounce that discriminatory "law" against the women of Afghanistan.
This is the same pattern observed in the cases of the dictatorial regimes such as those in Cuba, Zimbabwe, Sudan etc. and the collusion among dozens of other nations in the United Nations and orgs. such as the NOBEL PRIZE org. TO COVER UP, and close their eyes or worse, support regimes such as the ones above mentioned.
We do not need more of these things when the entire world is at the brink of a dangerous social explosion due to hunger, the repression, the direst Economic troubles that most nations are going through right at this same moment. http://www.digitaljournal.com/blog/2467
Peter Martori
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)