(Video) Palin on Hannity: ‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’

http://governorpalin4president.blogspot.com/2011/05/video-palin-on-hannity-not-real-fan-of.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

(Video) Palin on Hannity: ‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’ & ‘We Need A Conservative That Walks The Walk’

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Will Palin Jump Into Presidential Race? Part 1
Ma 18, 2011 - 4:51 - 
Former Alaska governor on potential bid for the White House
http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

Will Palin Jump Into Presidential Race? Part 2
Ma 18, 2011 - 4:09 - 
Former Alaska governor on potential bid for the White House
http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

Sarah Palin Rates 2012 Candidates Part 3
Ma 18, 2011 - 6:17 - 
Former Alaska governor on current pack of 2012 GOP candidates

corrupt, Hannity, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, ObamaCare, Palin, Reid, Sarah Palin

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

(Video) Palin on Hannity: 

‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’ & ‘We Need A Conservative That Walks The Walk’"

 

9 Things That Will Disappear In Our Lifetime

 NINE  Things That Will Disappear In Our Lifetime



Whether these changes are good or bad depends in part on how we adapt to them. But, ready or not, here they come. 



1. The Post Office   
Get ready to imagine a world without the post office. They are so deeply in financial trouble that there is probably no way to sustain it long term. Email, Fed Ex, and UPS have just about wiped out the minimum revenue needed to keep the post office alive. Most of your mail every day is junk mail and bills.

2. The Cheque
Britain is already laying the groundwork to do away with cheque by 2018. It costs the financial system billions of dollars a year to process cheques. Plastic cards and online transactions will lead to the eventual demise of the cheque. This plays right into the death of the post office. If you never paid your bills by mail and never received them by mail, the post office would absolutely go out of business.

3. The Newspaper 
The younger generation simply doesn't read the newspaper. They certainly don't subscribe to a daily delivered print edition. That may go the way of the milkman and the laundry man. As for reading the paper online, get ready to pay for it. The rise in mobile Internet devices and e-readers has caused all the newspaper and magazine publishers to form an alliance. They have met with Apple, Amazon, and the major cell phone companies to develop a model for paid subscription services.

4. The Book 
You say you will never give up the physical book that you hold in your hand and turn the literal pages. I said the same thing about downloading music from iTunes. I wanted my hard copy CD. But I quickly changed my mind when I discovered that I could get albums for half the price without ever leaving home to get the latest music. The same thing will happen with books. You can browse a bookstore online and even read a preview chapter before you buy. And the price is less than half that of a real book. And think of the convenience! Once you start flicking your fingers on the screen instead of the book, you find that you are lost in the story, can't wait to see what happens next, and you forget that you're holding a gadget instead of a book.





5. The Land Line Telephone 
Unless you have a large family and make a lot of local calls, you don't need it anymore. Most people keep it simply because they've always had it. But you are paying double charges for that extra service. All the cell phone companies will let you call customers using the same cell provider for no charge against your minutes

6. Music 

This is one of the saddest parts of the change story. The music industry is dying a slow death. Not just because of illegal downloading. It's the lack of innovative new music being given a chance to get to the people who would like to hear it. Greed and corruption is the problem. The record labels and the radio conglomerates are simply self-destructing. Over 40% of the music purchased today is "catalogue items," meaning traditional music that the public is familiar with. Older established artists. This is also true on the live concert circuit. To explore this fascinating and disturbing topic further, check out the book, "Appetite for Self-Destruction" by Steve Knopper, and the video documentary, "Before the Music Dies."

7. Television 
Revenues to the networks are down dramatically. Not just because of the economy. People are watching TV and movies streamed from their computers. And they're playing games and doing lots of other things that take up the time that used to be spent watching TV. Prime time shows have degenerated down to lower than the lowest common denominator. Cable rates are skyrocketing and commercials run about every 4 minutes and 30 seconds. I say good riddance to most of it. It's time for the cable companies to be put out of our misery. Let the people choose what they want to watch online and through Netflix.




8. The "Things" That You Own 
Many of the very possessions that we used to own are still in our lives, but we may not actually own them in the future. They may simply reside in "the cloud." Today your computer has a hard drive and you store your pictures, music, movies, and documents. Your software is on a CD or DVD, and you can always re-install it if need be. But all of that is changing. Apple, Microsoft, and Google are all finishing up their latest "cloud services." That means that when you turn on a computer, the Internet will be built into the operating system. So, Windows, Google, and the Mac OS will be tied straight into the Internet. If you click an icon, it will open something in the Internet cloud. If you save something, it will be saved to the cloud. And you may pay a monthly subscription fee to the cloud provider. In this virtual world, you can access your music or your books, or your whatever from any laptop or handheld device. That's the good news. But, will you actually own any of this "stuff" or will it all be able to disappear at any moment in a big "Poof?" Will most of the things in our lives be disposable and whimsical? It makes you want to run to the closet and pull out that photo album, grab a book from the shelf, or open up a CD case and pull out the insert.


9. Privacy 
If there ever was a concept that we can look back on nostalgically, it would be privacy. That's gone. It's been gone for a long time anyway. There are cameras on the street, in most of the buildings, and even built into your computer and cell phone. But you can be sure that 24/7, "They" know who you are and where you are, right down to the GPS coordinates, and the Google Street View. If you buy something, your habit is put into a zillion profiles, and your ads will change to reflect those habits. "They" will try to get you to buy something else. Again and again. 


All we will have left that can't be changed are "Memories".
And then probably Alzheimers will take that away from you too!

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2126/hamas-english-arabic‏

Posted by

Daniel Horowitz    http://www.redstate.com/users/dhorowitz3/

Monday, May 16th at 7:48AM EDT

 When Hon. Ex-Governor of Alaska, SARAH PALIN , asked and suggested to all those

  who would  like to hear it : to drill , drill, and drill for more OIL nobody listened. 

Back then ,in those days, it was a question of giving alaskans more jobs and increase

 the revenues for the State.

Now a days, when the Westerners and specially americans are paying a high price for filling up their cars gas tanks, the farmers paying more for their needs in fertilizers, fuel, etc. and the Transport companies raising prices it is very very much clear to anyone who wishes to think about the issue, that the OIL prices are  going up, and that the USA needs to start DRILLING  AND NOT JUST  ON LAND , BUT ALSO AT SEA. And this to get its independence  from the foreign oil suppliers. Thus by the same token creating conditions for more jobs and lower prices for all the americans.

The consequences of a high price of OIL to the entire western economies, and its repercurssions 

in the so called Third World nations is so evident that ,it is apalling to  know or to see people in power  as president Nobama denying  the facts and opposed to the openning up or more drillings

for OIL.

One can see a hidden anti-America agenda in his ineptitude and incapability to wish well to americans.

P.Martori

======================================

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

We've been here before.

Posted by Daniel Horowitz (Profile)

Monday, May 16th at 7:48AM EDT

18 Comments

Many liberals in the media are expressing shock over Obama’s apparent willingness

 to increase oil production.  We all know that he is full of …, I mean ethanol, and they do too.

Those of you who were befuddled at the news that Obama will ‘expand drilling’ in Alaska are not missing anything.  Obama has pulled this political chicanery a number of times.  Whenever a specific proposal that he so adamantly opposes becomes too popular to ignore, he announces his " support "  for it by promising to implement inconsequential reforms.  To that end, he declared during his Saturday radio address that he is “directing the Department of Interior

 to conduct annual lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, 

while respecting sensitive 

areas, and to speed up the evaluation of oil and gas resources in the mid and south Atlantic”. 

This means  where ? Where in the mid  and South of the Atlantic...???? SIC ! Please check the maps...P.Martori

So we are to believe that the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and ANWR, all of which are impounded from drilling leases by the administration, are more sensitive than Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve?  Caribou, baby, Caribou in ANWR; drill, baby, drill in ANPR?  Think again.

Here is the report from The Hill:

President Obama announced Saturday the government would hold annual onshore lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve; extend the life of leases in the Gulf of Mexico and in some areas off the coast of Alaska for one year; speed up ongoing Interior Department testing in the mid- and south-Atlantic to gauge the level of resources; and establish an interagency task force to coordinate permitting for offshore drilling in Alaska.

The White House is making the policy shifts after taking intense criticism from Republicans in recent weeks over energy policy as gas prices have topped $4 per gallon in some parts of the country.

Many of the proposals are incremental expansions of existing policies and had been set in motion prior to Saturday’s announcement.

 

It’s also unclear by how much the plan will increase domestic oil production. (emphasis added)

Once again, Obama is attempting to diffuse disquiet over his anti-energy policies by embracing the opposition through inconsequential and empty promises.  

He attempted this stratagem earlier this year when he announced wholesale regulatory reform in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

  

Amidst growing pressure to roll back job killing regulations, Obama announced a momentous effort to “study” onerous regulations.  Needless to say, the regulations in the federal register have only grown since his vapid announcement.  In fact, he is attempting to regulate every facet of our economy; from the broadband providers to oil refineries, without congressional approval.  Nonetheless, he is still studying the problem.

Obama used the same ploy in his State of the Union Address by embracing popular policies, such as a corporate tax cuts and tort reform.  We haven’t heard about them since the address and probably never will.

His promise to reform land lease permits and to allow drilling in Alaska is another attempt at subterfuge for the purpose of tamping down the outrage toward his job-killing, anti-growth policies.  After all, didn’t the administration oppose all three GOP bills that would implement some of these very changes just last week?  House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) released the following statement on Obama’s radio address:

“In the last week, House Republicans passed three bipartisan bills that will create 1.2 million jobs, triple American offshore oil production and generate $840 million in revenue - real action to produce real American energy. It’s ironic that while the White House and Congressional Democrats strongly criticized these efforts, President Obama is now taking tiny baby steps in our direction. The President is finally admitting what Republicans have known all along -

that increasing the supply of American energy will help lower prices and create jobs. 

One weekend address announcing minor policy tinkering, while positive, does not erase the Administration’s long job-destroying record of locking-up America’s energy resources.”

As Drudge observed yesterday, Obama made the exact same pledge over a year ago, immediately preceding his inexorable and unprecedented moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).  Sadly, the New York Times was credulous enough to believe it and carried water for Obama by headlining a story at that time titled, “Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time.”  That didn’t exactly work out according to plan.

As such, don’t be fooled by this foxhole conversion.  His speech does not reflect a newfoundobsequious to the will of the American people; he will never abdicate his radical ideology so easily.  Moreover, his political appointees at the Department of Energy and Department of Interior will wait for the inevitable lawsuits from environmental legal defense groups to scuttle the plans. 

 That is what the administration did when they blocked Shel Oil from drilling in the Arctic Ocean.  The environmentalists are already chomping at the bit.  And as is the case with every other proposal, he will encumber any meaningful drilling policies with endless environmental impact studies.  It’s akin to Obama’s promises of securing the border, even as his minions at the Department of Homeland Security instruct ICE agents not to apprehend non-criminal aliens. 

Talk is cheap, Mr. President, and in your case, it is worthless.

Call your members of congress and request that they support H.R. 1777, which would implement comprehensive pro-energy reforms, such as opening ANWR for drilling, streamlining the permit and leasing process, and lawsuit reform (summary and commentary here).  Let’s unmask Obama’s fallacious attempt at being pro-energy and make him take a stand against real energy production legislation !

L’imposture palestinienne de la Nakba

Monday, May 16, 2011 1:07 PM

L’imposture palestinienne de la Nakba

par Alain Legaret

La Palestine en totalité, 1922

"Les Palestiniens ont commencé vendredi à commémorer la "Nakba" (catastrophe), la création d'Israël en mai 1948 et leur exode.. "

C’est en ces termes que l’AFP a parlé hier de ces journées de colère des Palestiniens qui se répètent chaque année à même époque. 

Si l’association perfide de la "catastrophe" et de l’exil des Palestiniens avec la création de l’Etat d’Israël en 1948 n’est pas exclusive à l’Agence France-Presse, elle n’en reste pas moins inexacte.

J’explique, et comme je ne suis ni journaliste, ni diplomate du Quai d’Orsay, je jure de dire que la vérité, rien que la vérité. D’ailleurs, tout est facilement vérifiable sauf que ceux qui sont censés vous informer ne le font pas. Et à votre place, je veux dire si je vivais encore en France ou en Europe, je commencerais à m’inquiéter sérieusement de cette méconnaissance de la vérité par les élites. 


Mais je m’égare. Revenons donc à l’imposture : 

1-En novembre 1947, le plan de partage de l’ONU propose l’établissement d’un état juif et d’un état arabe sur les vingt pour cent qui restent de la Palestine alors que 80% sont déjà occupés par la Jordanie.

2- Les Arabes refusent ce plan.

Israël, après la guerre d'indépendance

3- Le 14 mai 1948, Israël déclare son indépendance conformément au plan de partage de l’ONU.

4- Immédiatement, dans la nuit du 14 au 15 mai 1948, commence la grande offensive des armées arabes, la première, pour détruire le jeune état juif.

5-A la suite de cette guerre, Israël se rend maître de la totalité de la Galilée, tandis que ce qu’il est commun aujourd’hui d’appeler les "territoires palestiniens" à savoir, la bande de Gaza et la Judée-Samarie (appelée aussi Cisjordanie) sont occupés respectivement par l’Egypte et par la Jordanie.

Pourquoi donc imputer la Nakba à l’Etat d’Israël alors que ce sont ses voisins qui occupent en 1948 les "territoires palestiniens" présumés ?

Les Palestiniens auraient dû logiquement s’en prendre à l’Egypte et à la Jordanie puisque ce sont elles les puissances occupantes qui ont pris ces territoires destinés à l’état arabe par le plan de partage de l’ONU.

Quant à la Galilée, elle est toujours aujourd'hui abondamment peuplée d’Arabes israéliens qui n’ont jamais été forcés de partir en 1948, et qui y mènent une vie tranquille. Ils ne sont pas stupides : ils savent très bien qu’après les rois et les dictateurs, ce sont eux les Arabes les plus libres et les plus émancipés du Moyen-Orient.

Enfin, les mauvais esprits qui veulent absolument rendre Israël coupable des malheurs de la région, invoqueront alors la prise de Gaza et de la Judée-Samarie par l’état juif lors de la deuxième grande offensive des pays arabes pour le détruire en 1967. 

Ils auront quand même beaucoup de mal à expliquer pourquoi entre 1948 et 1967, les Palestiniens n’ont jamais imputé la Nakba à l’Egypte et à la Jordanie, pourquoi ils n’ont jamais appelé alors ces territoires, les "territoires palestiniens occupés", et pourquoi ils n’ont jamais pensé à créer leur état entre ces deux dates.

JUST WANT YOU TO KEEP THIS GUY ON YOUR MIND FOR THE REST OF HIS TERM.

Download

View slide show (1)

|

Download as zip

JUST WANT YOU TO KEEP THIS GUY ON YOUR MIND FOR

THE REST OF HIS TERM.

Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 02:19:14 -0400

 SOME OF YOU WILL APPRECIATE THIS 

AND SOME OF YOU WILL NOT. 

I DO NOT APOLOGIZE FOR SENDING THIS 

BECAUSE ALL OF IT IS TRUE. !!!

JUST WANT YOU TO KEEP THIS GUY ON YOUR MIND 

FOR THE REST OF HIS TERM.  

IT SHOULDN'T BE HARD TO DO WITH ALL THE MISERY

HE HAS BROUGHT TO THIS COUNTRY.

If any other of our presidents 

had doubled the National Debt, which 

had taken more than two centuries 

to accumulate, in one year, 

would You have Approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had then proposed to Double 

the debt again within 10 years, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had criticized a State Law that 

he admitted he never even read, 

would you think that he is 

just an ignorant hot Head? 

If any other of our presidents 

joined the country of Mexico and sued a 

State in the United States to force that State 

to continue to allow Illegal Immigration, 

would you question his patriotism 

and wonder who's side he was on ? 

If any other of our presidents 

had pronounced the Marine Corps 

as if it were the Marine Corpse, 

would you think him an Idiot ? 

If any other of our presidents 

had put 87,000 workers out of work 

by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on 

offshore oil drilling on companies that have 

one of the best safety records of any industry 

because one foreign company had an accident, 

would you have agreed? 

If any other of our presidents 

had used a forged document as the 

basis of the moratorium that would render 

87000 American workers unemployed, 

would you support him? 

If any other of our presidents 

had been the first President to need a 

teleprompter installed to be able to get through 

a press conference, would you have laughed and said 

this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is 

really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes? 

If any other of our presidents 

had spent hundreds of thousands of Dollars 

to take his First Lady to a play in NYC, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had reduced your retirement plan holdings 

of GM stock by 90% and given the 

unions a majority stake in GM, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had made a joke at the expense 

of the Special Olympics, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive 

and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown 

had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had given the Queen of England an 

IPod containing videos of his speeches, 

would you have thought it to be a 

proud moment for America ? 

If any other of our presidents 

had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had visited Austria and made reference 

to the nonexistent "Austrian language," 

would you have brushed it off 

as a minor slip? 

Piiiiiiiiiiiiiisssttt !!!..

here did any mass media punk mocked

of his lack of culture or knowledge of the

world  geography ???

If any other of our presidents 

had filled his Cabinet and circle of 

Advisers with people who cannot seem 

to keep current on their Income Taxes, 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had stated that there were 57 states in 

the United States , wouldn't you have had 

second thoughts about his capabilities? 

Piiiiiiiiiiiiiisssttt !!!..here again !!!

 did any mass media punk mocked

of his lack of culture or knowledge 

If any other of our presidents 

would have flown all the way to Denmark 

to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics 

would benefit him walking out his front door in his 

home town, would you not have thought he was 

a self-important, conceited, egocentrical jerk? 

If any other of our presidents 

had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to 

"Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador 

when it was "The 5th of May" (Cinco de Mayo), 

and then continue to flub it when he tried again, 

wouldn't you have winced in embarrassment for such 

a jerk representing you as your president ? 

Piiiiiiiiiiiiiisssttt !!!..here again !!!

 did any mass media punk mocked

of his lack of culture or knowledge 

If any other of our presidents 

had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel 

to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, 

would you have concluded he's a Hypocrite? 

You american citizen don´t have enough

money to fill up your car but  this fake american

make you pay for this expensive trip...

If any other of our presidents' 

Administrations had okayed Air Force One 

flying low over millions of people followed by 

a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing 

widespread panic, would you have wondered 

whether they actually get what happened on 9-11? 

If any other of our presidents 

had failed to send relief aid to flood victims 

throughout the Midwest, with more people killed 

or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you 

want it made into a major ongoing Political issue 

with claims of racism and incompetence? 

If any other of our presidents 

had created the positions of 32 Czars 

who report directly to him, bypassing 

the House and Senate on much of 

what is happening in America , 

would you have approved? 

If any other of our presidents 

had ordered the firing of the CEO 

of a major corporation, even though he 

had no constitutional authority to do so, 

would you have approved...? 

IS HE THE OWNER  OR WHAT ?

So, tell me again, 

what is it about Obama that 

makes him so brilliant and impressive? 

Can't think of anything? 

i.e. the hesitation and inept indecision 

whether to intervene in Lybia.. or not...!

Then you'd better start worrying. 

He's done all these things in 28 months -- 

and you have less than 19 months 

to come up with an answer. 

Every statement and action in this email 

is factual and correctly attributable 

to Barrack Hussein Obama. 

Every bumble is a matter of record 

and completely verifiable.

IT IS UP TO YOU TO DO SOMETHING FOR

AMERICA AND NOT LET THIS GUY SINK IT 

DOWN TO ABYSMAL DEPTHS