SUGERENCIAS CONTRA LOS TORNADOS EN LOS U.S.A.

IN GOD WE TRUST !

SUGGESTIONS AGAINST THE TORNADOS

PHENOMENON IN THE U.S.A.   & ...MY THEORY !

SUGERENCIAS CONTRA LOS TORNADOS EN LOS U.S.A.

Por Pedro Martori

Parece ser que la temperatura del continente esta algo revuelta.

Las noticias que dan sobre los tornados en los estados del Mid West

dan mucho a pensar y causan pena ,pues el pueblo americno esta sufriendo

en toda esa region del centro y sur con los tornados y las inundaciones

Dos cosas me intrigan:

1.- Porque los gobiernos de ese pais y de los mismos estados afectados 

 tan regularmente, no han promulgado una ley para la construccion de viviendas

donde las normas y medidas de construccion esten aplicadas en funcion de los efectos de tornados y huracanes sobre las casas y edificios.?

2.- Como es que despues de tantas decadas del mismo fenomeno , en la ocurrencia , los TORNADOS, hasta la fecha los meteorologos y los cientificos no han asociado aun las causas de los tornados al efecto de invernadero y a las zonas deserticas del Sur Oeste de los USA ?

Con respecto a los huracanes se sabe que se producen debido al ascenso rapido de una masa de aire caliente sobre el mar generalmente. Dicha masa de aire caliente al ascender deja un espacio "vacio" que es automaticamente ocupado por masas de aire mas frio 

de los alrededores de ese espacio.

Luego, el proceso se continua , bajo variables y circunstancias que lo hacen crecer y mantenerse creciendo en fuerza y velocidad. Pero , las dos masas de aire, la Fria y la Caliente empiezan a girar impulsadas por la rotacion del mismo globo terrestre.

De esta forma es como nacen los huracanes en le mar y los tornados en tierra.

Mi propia conclusion o teoria al respecto de los tornados, o el porque son tan frecuentes en el centro de los USA se deriva de ese principo y de la misma dinamica que explico arriba. Lo que me intriga, es porque los meteorologos, geografos y los cientificos de ese pais, no han asociado el problema a las zonas semi-deserticas y deserticas del sur Oeste de los USA.

Como se sabe, los Desiertos durante el dia reciben una enorme cantidad de sol y se calientan como si fuesen planchas de cocinar. hasta el punto que es posible cocinar un huevo enlos desiertos como estos del Sur Oeste americano

Son varios los estados que tienen ese tipo de zonas deserticas o semi-deserticas.

Texas, New, Mexico,Arizona,Utah, Nevada, partes de California, partes de Colorado,cuyas arenas y tierras estan siendo calentadas durante horas. Es una vasta ,inmensa zona geografica que al ser calentada por los rayos del sol , producen AIRE CALENTADO que va ascendiendo y aumentando en velocidad segun se va calentando cada vez mas. Y al suceder eso, las MASAS de AIRE FRIO se meten a ocupar las zonas que ocupaban las masas de aire caliente./

Si se observa un mapa de los USA, veriamos que los Estados contiguos a estos, son los mas afectados por la aparicion o formacion de TORNADOS.

O sea : Oklahoma, Arkansas,Kansas, Texas,Missouri,Alabama etc. Todos esos Estados estan hacia el ESTE de los Estados con zonas deserticas. Y todos estan del lado Este de las cordilleras de las Rocosas, lo que impide que los vientos se dispersen hacia el Oeste y con lo cual los vientos frios del Norte del continente ( Canada) tienen un corredor en el Centro de los USA y cuya intensidad es mayor debido a que estan limitados por las montanias Rocosas al Oeste y los Apalaches al Este. Lo que implica que en el corredor o la zona Central de los USA es donde los vientos del Norte tienen mayor intensidad .

Toda esa zona desertica, no tiene casi ninguna humedad , por lo cual los vientos son secos

y raras veces traen lluvias. Seria bueno eliminar esas zonas con planes de IRRIGACION aprovechando , las crecidas del rio Mississippi y demas rios conexos, bombeando millones de barriles de agua hacia los desiertos del Sur-Oeste. 

El costo quedaria amortiguado, al ser eliminadas las enormes destrucciones que causan los TORNADOS cada anio y practicamente cada mes del anio. 

Al ser recuperadas las zonas deserticas para la AGRICULTURA y la RE-FORESTACION se eliminaria el clima seco, las masas de aire caliente que se producen bajo los efectos del sol sobre las arenas y causantes del movimiento dinamico de las masas de aire CALIENTE/ ASCENDIENTES  Y LAS FRIAS AL OCUPAR EL VACIO DEJADO POR  ELLAS..

Este movimiento de las masas de aire son las que causan o producen los Tornados y huracanes.

Si se llevara a cabo un tal Proyecto, se agrandarian las zonas Agricolas o tierras para ese efecto, y se evitaria la DESTRUCCION DE CASAS EDIFICIOS ETC. cada anio. las Cias. de Seguros, no tendrian que pagar indemnizaciones, por lo tanto , estarian en la obligacion de entrar en dicho proyecto y financiarlo en parte con el Gobierno.

Ademas de REVERDECER AL SUR-OESTE ,y eliminar la causa-origen de losTornados, el gobierno Federal y los Estatales, deben adoptar una LEY por la cual toda nueva construccion de casas familiares deben obedecer a una nueva NORMA DE CONSTRUCCION.

Dicha Norma estableceria , que toda vivienda privada, debe estar construida con techos

de CEMENTO REFORZADO CON CABILLAS DE HIERRO. 

Y las paredes  exteriores con ladrillos o bloques de cemento.

Es logico pensar que la industria maderera , no le convendria este cambio en las construcciones domiciliarias, pero se trata de evitar el enorme costo de cada anio en reconstruir nuevas casas ,un FENOMENO QUE NO OCURRE EN CASI NINGUN OTRO PAIS.

De todos modos y en toda logica, la Industria Forestal y maderera, no sufririan tanto, ya que en las construcciones que usan cemento siempre hara falta madera para diversas fases o partes de las construcciones en cemento .

Finalmente , todo lo explicado mas arriba-- referente a los Tornados -- se puede tambien aplicar a los huracanes en las zonas costeras del Sur de los USA. La Florida, Alabama, Texas y Lousiana 

Por Pedro Martori

http://kastroasesino.blogspot.com/

PERMISSION WOULD BE GRANTED TO TRAVEL OUTSIDE FROM THE GULAG...!

PERMISSION  WOULD BE GRANTED  TO TRAVEL OUTSIDE FROM THE GULAG...!
 

 "Tourist travel is already technically permitted, but an onerous,
 expensive bureaucratic process effectively halts all but select Castro loyalists from leaving.  --
The new " openning" is only a new form of extorsion against the relatives or friends of those who are living on the island-gulag.
  It is a new formula to rip off  more money from the  cubans abroad since  the cubans -- on the island  -- do not have the hard currency needed for those  "tourist" trips.

 I mean, this  WOULD BE  in the case  the regime  keeps  its "formula" for getting its hands on more divisas : USA dollars or EUROS.

I  believe that there  would be no changes in that  scam and extorsionist  scheme.

They will ask , to  the  would be "tourists",  to PAY IN U.S. DOLLAR$ OR IN EURO$  if they want to go  on a ""tourist trip"" .

 
It all fall from the  "tree"   of  logics , that if cubans do not have employments, ( 500,000 of them are now without jobs) and if  those

still  kept at their jobs , with  their salaries not  high enough to pay  for their tickets  which will be  purchasable -- ONLY -- in  Dollars or Euros but  converted in  special Pesos.

How  will they be able to pay all the red tape  and their  tickets in those hard currencies and where from  are they going to get any of those  two hard currency money ???

Of course , we cubans who have been 50 yrs. studying , analyzing and fighting that regime, we  know  where the money to those cubans on the island will come from : the cubans  in the Diaspora . From The USA, Europe and some other nations like Canada, Mexico etc.

And this is a fact , we can see the scheme and the extorsion behind this "other reform"  or "opportunities"  for the  cubans  in the gulag to  travel as "tourists" 

Here below another  commentary on the same subject  : the "reforms"...SIC !

P.MARTORI-------------

Damned professor Arch Ritter.!

What this apologetical professor of Carleton University in Ottawa did not mention ,when he comments on the housing deals approved recently in the gulag , is the fact that all those houses, apartment buildings and all the rest of the cuban real state sector was "confiscated " ....stolen ,is the best word to put it, were private properties. So what about the real or true owners ?

The other factor and most important , which he did not mention is the fact that there is a lack of housing dating back to 1975 and up to this very same day.

and...

That the calculated needs in housing for the people is estimated to over 3 million units or dwellings.

that...Since 1961 on, the regime did not allowed any private construction or ownership of any real state or land properties. In a country where 40,000 construction workers used to earn their livings...as can be seen in the many buildings built during the decade of the 1950-59 .

Finally the last and not the least is the dramatical ,tragical and difficult conditions in which THREE FAMILIE'S GENERATIONSshare the same small, uninhabitable spaces ( dwellings ) WITHOUT ANY HOPES OF CHANGE

SINCE DECADES AND FOR THE NEAREST FUTURE...!

It is hard to explain or describe to any person who does not live in Cuba, what those folks in those ""homes"" are suffering and enduring for years, decades now.

For instance :

Where crowded members -- very often -- three generation families share the same roof over their heads.

Where water supply is missing most of the day....Where electric power is some hours a day off...

Where the toilts "facility" is share by several dozens of THREE GENERATION FAMILIES...

NOW YOU READERS SHOULD IMAGINE THE STENCH THAT EMANATES FROM THOSE ""W.C.s ""

So much for the hundreds of situational facts that these professors, "" experts on Cuba things""will not talk about, neither know a damned about ...or even if that were the case are not willing to expose the miseries brought upon 11 millions cubans by the mafiosi regime that has been dictating over the cubans for over half a century.  http://kastroasesino.blogspot.com/

Peter Martori

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/10/world/americas/10cuba.html?_r=1&ref=world

Cuban Government Outlines Steps Toward a Freer Market

By RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

Published: May 9, 2011

•     

MEXICO CITY — For the first time since the Communist revolution 52 years ago, Cubans will be allowed to buy and sell houses and newer automobiles, and they may be able to travel abroad as tourists more freely, under policy changes announced Monday that are intended to shake up the country’s foundering economy.

Cubans lined up at kiosks to pay the equivalent of 12 cents for booklets outlining 313 guidelines approved at a historic Communist Party congress last month.

The publication lacked many details on what restrictions, taxes and other potential roadblocks the initiatives might include, according to reporters in Havana who purchased it. It was not available online and details on how the changes will be carried out will probably not be known until Cuba’s legislature codifies them in the coming months.

But analysts said that simply bringing into the open what had been a black market of house and automobile swaps could be one of the most significant changes to the economy in decades and could inject badly needed cash into the system.

Many Cubans hardly ever move, and they often are stuck driving crumbling Soviet-era cars bought from state dealers. Individuals are permitted to sell cars made before the 1959 revolution, but only to another owner.

“These are very important steps,” said Arch Ritter, an economist at Carleton University in Ottawa who studies Cuba. “To have a housing market, for example, will be of tremendous importance to Cuban citizens, because there hasn’t been a market in 50 years. In Cuba, people are born in the same house they die in.”

Cuban expatriates in the United States have closely followed the changes, eyeing the potential to snap up real estate through relatives on the island, though it remains to be seen if the government will put brakes on foreign ownership or financing.

Many of these changes are already under way, announced in a number of speeches by President Raúl Castro over the past several months. In the speeches, Mr. Castro declared that Cuba, hit hard by the global recession, deteriorating sugar market and, the government says, repercussions of the United States’ economic embargo, must move from an almost entirely state-based economy toward one allowing at least a little more free enterprise.

Mr. Castro has vowed to maintain socialism while taking steps like expanding the ranks of the self-employed and increasing the leasing of state land for private farming, all subject to heavy taxation.

But the publication released Monday included new or seldom-discussed nuggets. One was an effort to promote formation of cooperatives that The Associated Press reported could function as midsize companies, selling products directly to consumers.

The document also said leaders should “study a policy that allows Cubans living in the country to travel abroad as tourists.” Tourist travel is already technically permitted, but an onerous, expensive bureaucratic process effectively halts all but select Castro loyalists from leaving.

A version of this article appeared in print on May 10, 2011, on page A11 of the

 New York edition with the headline: Cuban Government Outlines Steps Toward

 a Freer Market.

(Video) Palin on Hannity: ‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’

http://governorpalin4president.blogspot.com/2011/05/video-palin-on-hannity-not-real-fan-of.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

(Video) Palin on Hannity: ‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’ & ‘We Need A Conservative That Walks The Walk’

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Will Palin Jump Into Presidential Race? Part 1
Ma 18, 2011 - 4:51 - 
Former Alaska governor on potential bid for the White House
http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

Will Palin Jump Into Presidential Race? Part 2
Ma 18, 2011 - 4:09 - 
Former Alaska governor on potential bid for the White House
http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

Sarah Palin Rates 2012 Candidates Part 3
Ma 18, 2011 - 6:17 - 
Former Alaska governor on current pack of 2012 GOP candidates

corrupt, Hannity, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, ObamaCare, Palin, Reid, Sarah Palin

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

http://bit.ly/jUrOZv 

(Video) Palin on Hannity: 

‘Not A Real Fan Of Politicians’ & ‘We Need A Conservative That Walks The Walk’"

 

9 Things That Will Disappear In Our Lifetime

 NINE  Things That Will Disappear In Our Lifetime



Whether these changes are good or bad depends in part on how we adapt to them. But, ready or not, here they come. 



1. The Post Office   
Get ready to imagine a world without the post office. They are so deeply in financial trouble that there is probably no way to sustain it long term. Email, Fed Ex, and UPS have just about wiped out the minimum revenue needed to keep the post office alive. Most of your mail every day is junk mail and bills.

2. The Cheque
Britain is already laying the groundwork to do away with cheque by 2018. It costs the financial system billions of dollars a year to process cheques. Plastic cards and online transactions will lead to the eventual demise of the cheque. This plays right into the death of the post office. If you never paid your bills by mail and never received them by mail, the post office would absolutely go out of business.

3. The Newspaper 
The younger generation simply doesn't read the newspaper. They certainly don't subscribe to a daily delivered print edition. That may go the way of the milkman and the laundry man. As for reading the paper online, get ready to pay for it. The rise in mobile Internet devices and e-readers has caused all the newspaper and magazine publishers to form an alliance. They have met with Apple, Amazon, and the major cell phone companies to develop a model for paid subscription services.

4. The Book 
You say you will never give up the physical book that you hold in your hand and turn the literal pages. I said the same thing about downloading music from iTunes. I wanted my hard copy CD. But I quickly changed my mind when I discovered that I could get albums for half the price without ever leaving home to get the latest music. The same thing will happen with books. You can browse a bookstore online and even read a preview chapter before you buy. And the price is less than half that of a real book. And think of the convenience! Once you start flicking your fingers on the screen instead of the book, you find that you are lost in the story, can't wait to see what happens next, and you forget that you're holding a gadget instead of a book.





5. The Land Line Telephone 
Unless you have a large family and make a lot of local calls, you don't need it anymore. Most people keep it simply because they've always had it. But you are paying double charges for that extra service. All the cell phone companies will let you call customers using the same cell provider for no charge against your minutes

6. Music 

This is one of the saddest parts of the change story. The music industry is dying a slow death. Not just because of illegal downloading. It's the lack of innovative new music being given a chance to get to the people who would like to hear it. Greed and corruption is the problem. The record labels and the radio conglomerates are simply self-destructing. Over 40% of the music purchased today is "catalogue items," meaning traditional music that the public is familiar with. Older established artists. This is also true on the live concert circuit. To explore this fascinating and disturbing topic further, check out the book, "Appetite for Self-Destruction" by Steve Knopper, and the video documentary, "Before the Music Dies."

7. Television 
Revenues to the networks are down dramatically. Not just because of the economy. People are watching TV and movies streamed from their computers. And they're playing games and doing lots of other things that take up the time that used to be spent watching TV. Prime time shows have degenerated down to lower than the lowest common denominator. Cable rates are skyrocketing and commercials run about every 4 minutes and 30 seconds. I say good riddance to most of it. It's time for the cable companies to be put out of our misery. Let the people choose what they want to watch online and through Netflix.




8. The "Things" That You Own 
Many of the very possessions that we used to own are still in our lives, but we may not actually own them in the future. They may simply reside in "the cloud." Today your computer has a hard drive and you store your pictures, music, movies, and documents. Your software is on a CD or DVD, and you can always re-install it if need be. But all of that is changing. Apple, Microsoft, and Google are all finishing up their latest "cloud services." That means that when you turn on a computer, the Internet will be built into the operating system. So, Windows, Google, and the Mac OS will be tied straight into the Internet. If you click an icon, it will open something in the Internet cloud. If you save something, it will be saved to the cloud. And you may pay a monthly subscription fee to the cloud provider. In this virtual world, you can access your music or your books, or your whatever from any laptop or handheld device. That's the good news. But, will you actually own any of this "stuff" or will it all be able to disappear at any moment in a big "Poof?" Will most of the things in our lives be disposable and whimsical? It makes you want to run to the closet and pull out that photo album, grab a book from the shelf, or open up a CD case and pull out the insert.


9. Privacy 
If there ever was a concept that we can look back on nostalgically, it would be privacy. That's gone. It's been gone for a long time anyway. There are cameras on the street, in most of the buildings, and even built into your computer and cell phone. But you can be sure that 24/7, "They" know who you are and where you are, right down to the GPS coordinates, and the Google Street View. If you buy something, your habit is put into a zillion profiles, and your ads will change to reflect those habits. "They" will try to get you to buy something else. Again and again. 


All we will have left that can't be changed are "Memories".
And then probably Alzheimers will take that away from you too!

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2126/hamas-english-arabic‏

Posted by

Daniel Horowitz    http://www.redstate.com/users/dhorowitz3/

Monday, May 16th at 7:48AM EDT

 When Hon. Ex-Governor of Alaska, SARAH PALIN , asked and suggested to all those

  who would  like to hear it : to drill , drill, and drill for more OIL nobody listened. 

Back then ,in those days, it was a question of giving alaskans more jobs and increase

 the revenues for the State.

Now a days, when the Westerners and specially americans are paying a high price for filling up their cars gas tanks, the farmers paying more for their needs in fertilizers, fuel, etc. and the Transport companies raising prices it is very very much clear to anyone who wishes to think about the issue, that the OIL prices are  going up, and that the USA needs to start DRILLING  AND NOT JUST  ON LAND , BUT ALSO AT SEA. And this to get its independence  from the foreign oil suppliers. Thus by the same token creating conditions for more jobs and lower prices for all the americans.

The consequences of a high price of OIL to the entire western economies, and its repercurssions 

in the so called Third World nations is so evident that ,it is apalling to  know or to see people in power  as president Nobama denying  the facts and opposed to the openning up or more drillings

for OIL.

One can see a hidden anti-America agenda in his ineptitude and incapability to wish well to americans.

P.Martori

======================================

Obama’s Oil Drilling Subterfuge

We've been here before.

Posted by Daniel Horowitz (Profile)

Monday, May 16th at 7:48AM EDT

18 Comments

Many liberals in the media are expressing shock over Obama’s apparent willingness

 to increase oil production.  We all know that he is full of …, I mean ethanol, and they do too.

Those of you who were befuddled at the news that Obama will ‘expand drilling’ in Alaska are not missing anything.  Obama has pulled this political chicanery a number of times.  Whenever a specific proposal that he so adamantly opposes becomes too popular to ignore, he announces his " support "  for it by promising to implement inconsequential reforms.  To that end, he declared during his Saturday radio address that he is “directing the Department of Interior

 to conduct annual lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, 

while respecting sensitive 

areas, and to speed up the evaluation of oil and gas resources in the mid and south Atlantic”. 

This means  where ? Where in the mid  and South of the Atlantic...???? SIC ! Please check the maps...P.Martori

So we are to believe that the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas and ANWR, all of which are impounded from drilling leases by the administration, are more sensitive than Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve?  Caribou, baby, Caribou in ANWR; drill, baby, drill in ANPR?  Think again.

Here is the report from The Hill:

President Obama announced Saturday the government would hold annual onshore lease sales in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve; extend the life of leases in the Gulf of Mexico and in some areas off the coast of Alaska for one year; speed up ongoing Interior Department testing in the mid- and south-Atlantic to gauge the level of resources; and establish an interagency task force to coordinate permitting for offshore drilling in Alaska.

The White House is making the policy shifts after taking intense criticism from Republicans in recent weeks over energy policy as gas prices have topped $4 per gallon in some parts of the country.

Many of the proposals are incremental expansions of existing policies and had been set in motion prior to Saturday’s announcement.

 

It’s also unclear by how much the plan will increase domestic oil production. (emphasis added)

Once again, Obama is attempting to diffuse disquiet over his anti-energy policies by embracing the opposition through inconsequential and empty promises.  

He attempted this stratagem earlier this year when he announced wholesale regulatory reform in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

  

Amidst growing pressure to roll back job killing regulations, Obama announced a momentous effort to “study” onerous regulations.  Needless to say, the regulations in the federal register have only grown since his vapid announcement.  In fact, he is attempting to regulate every facet of our economy; from the broadband providers to oil refineries, without congressional approval.  Nonetheless, he is still studying the problem.

Obama used the same ploy in his State of the Union Address by embracing popular policies, such as a corporate tax cuts and tort reform.  We haven’t heard about them since the address and probably never will.

His promise to reform land lease permits and to allow drilling in Alaska is another attempt at subterfuge for the purpose of tamping down the outrage toward his job-killing, anti-growth policies.  After all, didn’t the administration oppose all three GOP bills that would implement some of these very changes just last week?  House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings (R-WA) released the following statement on Obama’s radio address:

“In the last week, House Republicans passed three bipartisan bills that will create 1.2 million jobs, triple American offshore oil production and generate $840 million in revenue - real action to produce real American energy. It’s ironic that while the White House and Congressional Democrats strongly criticized these efforts, President Obama is now taking tiny baby steps in our direction. The President is finally admitting what Republicans have known all along -

that increasing the supply of American energy will help lower prices and create jobs. 

One weekend address announcing minor policy tinkering, while positive, does not erase the Administration’s long job-destroying record of locking-up America’s energy resources.”

As Drudge observed yesterday, Obama made the exact same pledge over a year ago, immediately preceding his inexorable and unprecedented moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).  Sadly, the New York Times was credulous enough to believe it and carried water for Obama by headlining a story at that time titled, “Obama to Open Offshore Areas to Oil Drilling for First Time.”  That didn’t exactly work out according to plan.

As such, don’t be fooled by this foxhole conversion.  His speech does not reflect a newfoundobsequious to the will of the American people; he will never abdicate his radical ideology so easily.  Moreover, his political appointees at the Department of Energy and Department of Interior will wait for the inevitable lawsuits from environmental legal defense groups to scuttle the plans. 

 That is what the administration did when they blocked Shel Oil from drilling in the Arctic Ocean.  The environmentalists are already chomping at the bit.  And as is the case with every other proposal, he will encumber any meaningful drilling policies with endless environmental impact studies.  It’s akin to Obama’s promises of securing the border, even as his minions at the Department of Homeland Security instruct ICE agents not to apprehend non-criminal aliens. 

Talk is cheap, Mr. President, and in your case, it is worthless.

Call your members of congress and request that they support H.R. 1777, which would implement comprehensive pro-energy reforms, such as opening ANWR for drilling, streamlining the permit and leasing process, and lawsuit reform (summary and commentary here).  Let’s unmask Obama’s fallacious attempt at being pro-energy and make him take a stand against real energy production legislation !

L’imposture palestinienne de la Nakba

Monday, May 16, 2011 1:07 PM

L’imposture palestinienne de la Nakba

par Alain Legaret

La Palestine en totalité, 1922

"Les Palestiniens ont commencé vendredi à commémorer la "Nakba" (catastrophe), la création d'Israël en mai 1948 et leur exode.. "

C’est en ces termes que l’AFP a parlé hier de ces journées de colère des Palestiniens qui se répètent chaque année à même époque. 

Si l’association perfide de la "catastrophe" et de l’exil des Palestiniens avec la création de l’Etat d’Israël en 1948 n’est pas exclusive à l’Agence France-Presse, elle n’en reste pas moins inexacte.

J’explique, et comme je ne suis ni journaliste, ni diplomate du Quai d’Orsay, je jure de dire que la vérité, rien que la vérité. D’ailleurs, tout est facilement vérifiable sauf que ceux qui sont censés vous informer ne le font pas. Et à votre place, je veux dire si je vivais encore en France ou en Europe, je commencerais à m’inquiéter sérieusement de cette méconnaissance de la vérité par les élites. 


Mais je m’égare. Revenons donc à l’imposture : 

1-En novembre 1947, le plan de partage de l’ONU propose l’établissement d’un état juif et d’un état arabe sur les vingt pour cent qui restent de la Palestine alors que 80% sont déjà occupés par la Jordanie.

2- Les Arabes refusent ce plan.

Israël, après la guerre d'indépendance

3- Le 14 mai 1948, Israël déclare son indépendance conformément au plan de partage de l’ONU.

4- Immédiatement, dans la nuit du 14 au 15 mai 1948, commence la grande offensive des armées arabes, la première, pour détruire le jeune état juif.

5-A la suite de cette guerre, Israël se rend maître de la totalité de la Galilée, tandis que ce qu’il est commun aujourd’hui d’appeler les "territoires palestiniens" à savoir, la bande de Gaza et la Judée-Samarie (appelée aussi Cisjordanie) sont occupés respectivement par l’Egypte et par la Jordanie.

Pourquoi donc imputer la Nakba à l’Etat d’Israël alors que ce sont ses voisins qui occupent en 1948 les "territoires palestiniens" présumés ?

Les Palestiniens auraient dû logiquement s’en prendre à l’Egypte et à la Jordanie puisque ce sont elles les puissances occupantes qui ont pris ces territoires destinés à l’état arabe par le plan de partage de l’ONU.

Quant à la Galilée, elle est toujours aujourd'hui abondamment peuplée d’Arabes israéliens qui n’ont jamais été forcés de partir en 1948, et qui y mènent une vie tranquille. Ils ne sont pas stupides : ils savent très bien qu’après les rois et les dictateurs, ce sont eux les Arabes les plus libres et les plus émancipés du Moyen-Orient.

Enfin, les mauvais esprits qui veulent absolument rendre Israël coupable des malheurs de la région, invoqueront alors la prise de Gaza et de la Judée-Samarie par l’état juif lors de la deuxième grande offensive des pays arabes pour le détruire en 1967. 

Ils auront quand même beaucoup de mal à expliquer pourquoi entre 1948 et 1967, les Palestiniens n’ont jamais imputé la Nakba à l’Egypte et à la Jordanie, pourquoi ils n’ont jamais appelé alors ces territoires, les "territoires palestiniens occupés", et pourquoi ils n’ont jamais pensé à créer leur état entre ces deux dates.